Background
Bryan (14) and Steven (12) are brothers living in separate foster homes. Though both placements were stable—Bryan with carers Mo and Nisha, and Steven with Helen and Winston—their sibling visits had become increasingly difficult. The boys would arrive dysregulated, overwhelmed by the emotional intensity of seeing each other. Bryan often became loud and impulsive, while Steven would shut down or lash out. Visits were ending early, carers were growing anxious, and the boys’ relationship—already strained by separation—was beginning to unravel.
Presenting Needs
The challenges weren’t just behavioural—they were relational. Bryan and Steven had different sensory profiles and communication styles. Bryan sought stimulation to regulate, while Steven truggled with auditory processing and often misinterpreted his brother’s energy as aggression. The visits were emotionally loaded, and the lack of structure and predictability only added to the stress. Carers were unsure how to help, and the risk of visits being reduced or stopped was growing.
Relational Intervention
Rather than focusing solely on the boys, the Selenos team worked relationally — bringing together carers, therapists, speech and language specialists, and occupational therapists to form a shared understanding.
• The SLT highlighted how language differences were fuelling misunderstandings.
• The OT explained how sensory overload was triggering dysregulation.
• The therapists explored the boys’ early relational patterns and how these were playing out in their current dynamic.
• The carers shared their observations and concerns, which were validated and explored in reflective space.
Together, the team co-created a new approach to visits. Sessions were moved to a consistent, child-friendly venue—a community space where the boys could feel safe and familiar. Visits were structured with gentle transitions, sensory supports, and shared activities that allowed the brothers to connect without pressure. Carers were supported to prepare the boys beforehand and debrief afterwards. Between visits, the boys exchanged drawings and voice notes to maintain a sense of connection.
Therapeutic Work
Alongside the relational planning, both Bryan and Steven were engaged in individual therapy. As their sense of safety grew, their therapy began to explore family dynamics—helping them process their early experiences, the loss of their shared home, and the evolving nature of their relationship. They began to understand that their behaviours during visits were not failures, but expressions of grief, confusion, and longing. This insight helped them approach each other with more empathy and less fear.
Outcomes
The change was profound. The boys began to look forward to their visits. They were able to stay regulated for longer, and their interactions became more playful and affectionate. Carers reported feeling more confident and supported, and their motivation to sustain contact was renewed. The boys’ relationship, once at risk, began to grow again; rooted in safety, understanding, and shared joy.
Reflections
This case illustrates the heart of Selenos’ relational practice: healing doesn’t happen in isolation—it happens in community. By weaving together the insights and care of everyone around the child, we create a network of safety and connection. This is what it means to build a community around the child.